Financial instability often compounds the emotional strain of divorce and separation. Recognizing this, the Hindu Marriage Act of 1955 introduced a vital safeguard—Section 24—ensuring financial support for spouses caught in the throes of matrimonial proceedings. For thousands of Indian men and women, Section 24 can be the difference between hardship and security during the uncertain period before a court judgment is passed.
This provision is not just procedural; it reflects the evolving realities of Indian families where economic disparities exist, and gender roles are changing. Modern matrimonial disputes bring Section 24 into sharp focus, as judges weigh fairness, earning capacities, and social realities to grant maintenance and alimony on an interim basis.
Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act empowers either spouse facing insufficient income to apply for maintenance and litigation expenses during the pendency of matrimonial proceedings, such as divorce, separation, or annulment.
To claim interim maintenance under Section 24, certain prerequisites must be met:
Once these criteria are established, the court evaluates the financial circumstances of both spouses. Notably, the law is gender-neutral, allowing either spouse to claim relief.
The court exercises discretion in determining the quantum and duration of maintenance, guided by factors like:
Beyond this, the law tries to avoid incentivizing frivolous claims or rewarding deliberate unemployment, as reflected in several court judgments.
“The purpose of Section 24 is to ensure that neither spouse is reduced to destitution during proceedings, but at the same time, to prevent misuse of the provision by parties acting in bad faith.”
— Advocate Rekha Aggarwal, Delhi High Court
Section 24 comes to life not only in legal texts but also in Indian courtrooms. Each case shapes the contour of what qualifies as “sufficient income” and “reasonable expenses,” adapting to the society’s changing nature.
In metro cities, where dual-income households are more common, courts often scrutinize both spouses’ earning abilities, educational background, and even potential for future employment.
There is no fixed formula for calculation, as Indian courts avoid a one-size-fits-all approach. Nevertheless, several elements feature consistently in court orders:
In practice, interim maintenance is granted quickly—within a few months—recognizing the urgency and sensitive circumstances.
While initially assumed to protect wives, Section 24 has become increasingly relevant for husbands as well, especially as more women enter the workforce. Family courts today receive a growing number of applications from men seeking interim support, challenging stereotypes and affirming the gender-neutral spirit of the Act.
Despite clear legal provisions, practical hurdles remain. Courts often face delays due to incomplete income affidavits, deliberate suppression of financial information, or stalling tactics by resistant spouses. Additionally, collection and enforcement of interim alimony can be difficult if the payer evades compliance.
Certain high-value cases in Mumbai and Delhi, for instance, have seen courts order the freezing of bank accounts or garnishing salaries of erring spouses to enforce maintenance payments.
It’s important to distinguish between interim maintenance (Section 24) and permanent alimony (Section 25). While Section 24 covers the period during which legal proceedings are ongoing, Section 25 addresses maintenance after the final decree. Often, the interim arrangement is superseded by a final settlement based on the outcome of the case.
Additionally, Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 18 of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act constitute parallel remedies, but Section 24 is notable for its immediate, case-specific support during litigation, regardless of fault or marital misconduct.
Contemporary Indian courts are adapting to a digital era. Increasingly, evidence such as online bank statements, social media profiles, and electronic salary slips are used to ascertain real income and spending habits. This technological shift helps judges curb false claims and reach fairer decisions promptly.
Moreover, in the wake of COVID-19, courts have encountered more cases involving job losses and sudden income changes, which have reshaped the way maintenance is calibrated. Judicial innovation—such as time-bound orders and regular monitoring—keeps Section 24 dynamic and responsive to societal needs.
Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act forms a critical pillar of matrimonial justice in India, ensuring that economic dependency does not become a weapon in marital litigation. While the law’s intent is clear, its real-world application continues to evolve with changing social norms, judicial interpretation, and the economic realities of modern India. For those navigating the turbulence of separation, awareness and timely invocation of Section 24 can be pivotal.
What is the objective of Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act?
The main aim is to provide interim financial support to a financially weaker spouse during litigation, ensuring neither party suffers undue hardship before the court’s final decision.
Can a husband apply for maintenance under Section 24?
Yes, Section 24 is gender-neutral. Both husbands and wives can seek interim maintenance if they lack adequate income during matrimonial proceedings.
How is the amount of interim maintenance determined?
Courts consider factors such as the standard of living during marriage, income and assets of both spouses, living expenses, and the needs of children, if any.
Does Section 24 apply to cases other than divorce?
Yes, Section 24 can be invoked in any proceeding under the Hindu Marriage Act, including annulment or judicial separation, as long as financial need is demonstrated.
What happens if the spouse ordered to pay does not comply?
Courts can enforce maintenance orders through wage garnishment, asset freezing, or by imposing penalties for non-compliance.
How is Section 24 different from Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act?
While Section 24 grants temporary maintenance during litigation, Section 25 deals with long-term or permanent alimony, typically decided after the case concludes.
India’s criminal justice system is built upon countless statutes, but few are as frequently invoked—yet…
India stands as the world's largest democracy, a dynamic system underpinned by a deeply embedded…
Social justice sits at the heart of the Indian Constitution, woven into its fabric through…
India’s federal structure, as designed by the framers of the Constitution, anticipates both cooperation and…
Few decisions in Indian judicial history have transformed the interpretation of fundamental rights as profoundly…
In the digital era, internet freedom—and its limits—are fiercely debated across India. Section 67A of…