Workplace rights and humane labor practices remain central pillars of democratic societies, shaping both economic productivity and social justice. In the Indian context, these ideas take constitutional form in the Directive Principles of State Policy, where Article 42 stands out as a beacon for workers’ dignity. Article 42 of the Indian Constitution places an explicit obligation on the State: to “make provision for securing just and humane conditions of work and for maternity relief.”
Emerging from the tumultuous era of pre-Independence labor exploitation and global movements for workers’ protection, the inclusion of Article 42 in 1950 reflected India’s larger vision of social reform. Technically non-justiciable—meaning, it cannot be directly enforced by courts—this Article nevertheless exerts a profound moral and policymaking influence. As India’s economy expands and diversifies, the commitment embedded in Article 42 retains enduring resonance.
Article 42 is part of the Directive Principles of State Policy (Part IV, Articles 36–51). These principles guide governance, shaping laws and administration toward a welfare state model. Unlike Fundamental Rights, Directive Principles—by design—are non-justiciable. Still, the judiciary often interprets other laws in light of these principles, lending them considerable weight in actual outcomes.
The precise language of Article 42 is significant:
“The State shall make provision for securing just and humane conditions of work and for maternity relief.”
This succinct provision emphasizes two core values:
– Just and humane conditions of work: Recognizing the right to fair and safe occupational circumstances.
– Maternity relief: Affirming State responsibility toward working mothers, including health, safety, and financial security during maternity.
While not directly enforceable, Article 42 prompted a series of landmark labor laws:
These statutes, among others, collectively transformed the nation’s legal landscape for workforce welfare, showing Article 42’s real-world traction.
Indian courts have frequently cited Article 42 to interpret and augment labor protections. For example, in the case of Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Female Workers (Muster Roll), the Supreme Court read the Maternity Benefit Act expansively to include even temporary workers, grounding its approach in the vision of Article 42.
“Article 42 of the Constitution… casts an obligation on the State to make provision for securing just and humane conditions of work,” emphasized Justice S. Saghir Ahmad in the landmark judgment, justifying broad protections for all categories of female workers.
Beyond maternity, higher courts have used Article 42 as philosophical grounding to address safety standards, occupational diseases, and even the right to rest and leisure.
Since independence, practical application of Article 42’s ethos has propelled several advances:
Yet, this progress remains uneven.
Despite a robust regulatory framework, ground realities diverge sharply:
A report by the International Labour Organization notes that “while legislative protection exists, the reach and implementation often lag due to informality and socio-cultural inertia.”
Consider a mid-sized garment manufacturing firm in Bengaluru. After 2017’s amendment to the Maternity Benefit Act, the company introduced 26 weeks of paid maternity leave, mandating nursing breaks and ensuring workstation ergonomics for expecting mothers. While such practices improved retention and morale, the company faced higher operational costs and navigated employee skepticism about returning to demanding roles. This scenario typifies India’s broader journey: strides toward humane work conditions, tempered by economic constraints and social attitudes.
Against international frameworks—like the International Labour Organization’s conventions, many of which India has ratified—Article 42 and its legislative offspring set reasonable benchmarks, though implementation broadly trails European standards. Multinational corporations operating in India often raise the bar at their facilities, but the informal sector’s realities continue to fall short.
Several ongoing shifts promise to reinforce the core ideals of Article 42:
However, competing economic pressures—such as the post-pandemic recovery, automation, and global supply chain demands—pose continuous risks to workplace welfare standards.
Effective realization of Article 42 demands coordinated action:
Article 42 of the Indian Constitution enshrines a critical vision: just, humane working conditions and robust maternity protection as the backbone of a dignified workforce. Its direct and indirect impacts have shaped generations of labor laws and inspired progressive business practices. Yet, India’s journey is incomplete—major gaps persist, particularly in the vast informal sector. The future of Article 42 depends on continuous enforcement, evolving corporate citizenship, and an unwavering commitment to translating constitutional ideals into workplace realities.
Article 42 directs the State to ensure just and humane working conditions, along with the provision of maternity relief. It is a part of the Directive Principles meant to guide legislative and administrative policies.
No, Article 42 is not directly enforceable by courts. However, it serves as a guiding principle, influencing legislation and judicial interpretations related to labor rights.
Article 42 has inspired several key labor laws, such as the Factories Act and the Maternity Benefit Act, establishing standards for workplace safety and maternity leave.
While Article 42 serves as a foundation, its practical benefits are mostly realized in the formal sector. Informal workers often remain outside the full scope of statutory protections.
Major challenges include weak enforcement, widespread informal employment, and low awareness of worker rights—especially among women and marginalized workers.
Maternity leave provisions flow from laws like the Maternity Benefit Act, which are inspired by Article 42. The law requires most employers to provide maternity benefits, but coverage varies between formal and informal sectors.
India’s criminal justice system is built upon countless statutes, but few are as frequently invoked—yet…
India stands as the world's largest democracy, a dynamic system underpinned by a deeply embedded…
Social justice sits at the heart of the Indian Constitution, woven into its fabric through…
India’s federal structure, as designed by the framers of the Constitution, anticipates both cooperation and…
Few decisions in Indian judicial history have transformed the interpretation of fundamental rights as profoundly…
In the digital era, internet freedom—and its limits—are fiercely debated across India. Section 67A of…