India’s constitutional journey is both a story of ancient challenges and modern aspirations. At the center of this evolution is the relentless effort to create an egalitarian society, free from historical injustices. Among the Indian Constitution’s most powerful provisions, Article 17 stands as a bulwark against the deeply entrenched evil of “untouchability,” a practice that had plagued India for centuries. Commonly searched in Hindi as “अनुच्छेद 17,” this article not only outlaws untouchability but embodies India’s commitment to social justice.
Article 17 of the Indian Constitution reads:
“Untouchability” is abolished and its practice in any form is forbidden. The enforcement of any disability arising out of “Untouchability” shall be an offence punishable in accordance with law.
In Hindi, it translates as:
“अस्पृश्यता का उन्मूलन और किसी भी रूप में उसका आचरन निषिद्ध है। अस्पृश्यता के आधार पर लागू की गई कोई भी बाध्यता कानून के अनुसार दंडनीय अपराध होगी।”
This clear, categorical language was a revolutionary move at the time of Independence. Unlike many constitutional provisions that grant rights subject to “reasonable restrictions,” Article 17 is absolute. There are no exceptions, caveats, or conditions—underscoring the depth of its moral and social imperative.
Untouchability, or अस्पृश्यता, has ancient roots in sections of Indian society, especially entrenched under the caste system. Over generations, entire communities faced social exclusion, denied entry to public spaces, and even access to essentials like water and education. The oppressive customs persisted despite reformist movements and legislative efforts in British India.
Post-Independence, the Constitution’s framers—deeply influenced by social reformers like Dr. B.R. Ambedkar—sought to use the law as an instrument of transformative justice. Article 17 was a direct response, aiming to break the shackles of inherited inequality.
Article 17 laid the groundwork, but implementation required further legislative action. The Parliament enacted the Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955, to specify penalties and mechanisms for prosecuting offenses related to untouchability. Later, the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 extended protections, focusing on preventing targeted violence and discrimination against Dalits and Adivasis.
The judiciary, too, has been assertive. Landmark Supreme Court judgments have reiterated that untouchability is not just about physical segregation but encompasses social, economic, and psychological forms of exclusion. The courts have clarified that the term “untouchability” in the constitutional context has a broad interpretation beyond traditional notions.
“Article 17 represents not just a legal abolition, but a social revolution. It is a testament to the willpower of a modern nation refusing to tolerate ancient injustices,” observes Dr. Nandini Sundar, a sociologist and constitutional expert.
While significant progress has occurred—many public spaces and institutions are now open to all citizens regardless of caste—reports of discrimination and violence persist, especially in rural areas. Several studies and media investigations highlight cases where Dalits and other marginalized communities continue to face hurdles in accessing temples, schools, and drinking water sources.
Government initiatives, awareness campaigns, and grassroots activism play a vital role in challenging these remnants. However, the continued existence of caste-based violence reminds us that legal change is only the beginning; true social transformation is an ongoing process.
The inclusion of Article 17 in the Fundamental Rights chapter signals its foundational role in India’s vision of liberty and equality. It goes beyond addressing one form of discrimination to set an example for tackling many other social evils.
Beyond legal mandates, Article 17 is a philosophical assertion: that no individual should be subjected to humiliation by accident of birth. In effect, it seeks to restore dignity and empower historically marginalized citizens, aligning India’s values with global human rights standards.
Internationally, Article 17 is frequently cited in global forums as a model for dismantling systemic discrimination.
Recent years have witnessed renewed attention toward caste-based discrimination, both in national politics and civil society. Social media campaigns, literary works, films, and public protests have revived discourse, highlighting both progress and persisting injustices.
In some instances, debates have emerged around the broader application of Article 17: Should it address modern manifestations of exclusion, such as digital discrimination or housing segregation? Experts argue that for Article 17 to retain its relevance, its spirit must adapt to newer challenges while retaining its uncompromising stance against untouchability.
There are powerful stories of resilience and change. From villages in Tamil Nadu where Dalit women have led temple entry movements to urban campaigns promoting inter-caste dining, the legacy of Article 17 inspires new generations to push for a more inclusive India.
NGOs like Navsarjan Trust and movements such as Dalit Shakti have become crucial allies in educating communities and ensuring that the rights granted by the Constitution find real-world expression.
Article 17 (“अनुच्छेद 17”) stands as one of the Constitution’s most forceful declarations against inherited inequality. By abolishing untouchability in all its forms, it marked a bold moral and legal leap for a new nation. Yet experience shows that the struggle for equality requires not just robust legal provisions but sustained societal commitment, vigilant enforcement, and the courage to confront uncomfortable realities. As India continues to evolve, the true power of अनुच्छेद 17 lies in its enduring promise—and in the ongoing activism that brings its vision closer to reality.
Article 17 abolishes “untouchability” and forbids its practice in any form across India, declaring any related discrimination a punishable offense.
It represents an uncompromising stand against caste-based discrimination, reinforcing equality and dignity for all citizens regardless of social background.
Laws like the Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955, and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 provide mechanisms to prosecute and punish violations.
Though legally abolished, caste-based discrimination and incidents of untouchability persist in various regions, particularly in rural settings.
Yes, engaging in untouchability or related practices is a criminal offense and is subject to legal penalties as prescribed by Indian law.
It has enabled social reforms, expanded rights and opportunities for marginalized communities, and continues to inspire activism for greater inclusion and equality.
India’s criminal justice framework relies heavily on the Indian Penal Code (IPC), an extensive legal…
Bail is a cornerstone of criminal jurisprudence, ensuring that an accused person is not unnecessarily…
Public health stands as a cornerstone for any society aspiring to thrive, innovate, and achieve…
India’s roads are among the busiest, most diverse, and sometimes, most chaotic in the world.…
The Indian Constitution stands as a beacon for justice, equality, and liberty. Among its many…
Article 20 stands as one of the fundamental safeguards within the Indian Constitution, providing essential…